Are We Asking the Wrong Question in the Screen Time Debate?
Masciola: Instead of asking whether screens are good or bad, we should be asking: What kind of on-screen media are children engaging with?
For years, the conversation around young children and screens has been dominated by a fear of too much time, too little interaction and too many missed opportunities for real learning. In many cases, those concerns are justified. After all, consistently shows that children’s excessive or passive screen use, especially of entertainment-heavy content, can negatively impact their literacy and language development.
But while screen time limits are one solution, they still treat the screen itself as the problem, when a screen is simply another opportunity for communication and exploration, just like a book, game or toy. With this in mind, what if the real question isn’t, “How much screen time is okay for kids?” but, “How can we make children’s screen time more meaningful?”
At Pittsburgh’s PBS station WQED, we believe literacy starts long before a child can decode words on a page. It starts with conversation, curiosity, stories, songs, play and trusted characters who help children make meaning of the world. Instead of asking whether screens are good or bad, we should be asking: What kind of on-screen media are children engaging with, and how is that shaping their relationship with reading?
When content is intentionally designed to build literacy skills through storytelling, vocabulary exposure and narrative comprehension, it can complement and encourage reading behaviors. from The Ohio State University found that first graders who engaged more frequently with educational media not only spent more time reading but also spent less overall time on screens. This emerging research complicates the long-held assumption that all screen time displaces reading and may even help shift the narrative toward seeing meaningful screen use as a gateway to developing healthy reading habits.
Educational media can also introduce children to characters, story arcs, vocabulary and language structures that mirror the foundations of books.
The point is not that all screen time is equal; it is that trusted, intentionally designed media can help open the door to reading.
The interactivity and engagement of screen time can also be beneficial. When used thoughtfully, highly engaging and interactive educational media can help caregivers and educators create everyday literacy moments, especially in communities where access to books, time, and resources can vary.
That’s why, in Pittsburgh, WQED has joined the “” campaign — a collaborative effort among libraries, literacy organizations, and The Grable Foundation to not only put more books in young people’s hands, but also to support the region’s adults as allies in children’s literacy.
Parents and early childhood educators can further support this approach by asking children open-ended questions, connecting media to children’s own experiences and turning screen time into a shared literacy experience. I’ve personally watched a child become absorbed in an episode of Daniel Tiger’s Neighborhood, then walk across the room to find a similar idea waiting in a book. That moment of recognition — that connection — is how a love of reading starts to blossom. And when children move from consuming stories to creating them through drawing and writing, it further strengthens their confidence and their identity as readers and storytellers.
We are raising children in a media-rich world. The answer is not to pretend screens will disappear or to leave families to navigate them alone. The answer is to surround children with meaningful stories — on the page, on the screen, in classrooms, in libraries and at home — and help caring adults turn those stories into conversation, curiosity and confidence. If we want to raise a generation of readers, we should see the educational media that children engage with on screens not being in competition with books but as another pathway to discover the joy of reading.
Did you use this article in your work?
We’d love to hear how 91ɬ’s reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.