91涩漫

Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for 91涩漫 Newsletter

A bill that would require states to only use the science of reading in classrooms in order to qualify for a multi-million dollar funding grant passed with bipartisan support from a committee of federal lawmakers Thursday morning.

The (S.4689) would strengthen the federal government鈥檚 oversight of the science of reading through amendments to the , which currently provides $194 million to aid literacy instruction in 23 states.聽

鈥淐apable students are dropping out of high school simply because they were never taught to read,鈥� said U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee chairman Bill Cassidy, a Republican from Louisiana. 鈥淭his legislation aims to address the national literacy crisis by strengthening evidence-based literacy instruction 鈥� and empowering states, local communities and parents with more resources.鈥�

After the bill鈥檚 20-2 passage out of the Senate HELP Committee, it now heads to the floor for a full senate vote. Other bills, including one that would explicitly identify dyslexia as a learning disability under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, also passed Thursday.

The READ Act closely mirrors and expands on a similar bill that unanimously passed the House of Representative鈥檚 Education Committee in March, but has not yet been taken up for a full House vote.

Both the Senate and House bill aim to define the science of reading in federal law as instruction that teaches phonics and phonemic awareness and also builds vocabulary, fluency, comprehension, oral language and writing skills. 

A report released earlier this year found nearly a third of teachers still used 鈥渄iscredited鈥� methods to teach kids how to read and aren鈥檛 fully committed to the science of reading. Both bills, however, would reject the use of federal funds for other teaching methods, such as three-cueing, where students are asked to figure out unfamiliar words through context clues or pictures.

The READ Act further includes proposals for prioritizing federal support for the bottom 10% of underperforming states and shifting funding of individual literacy projects to more systematic widespread efforts like requirements for early literacy screening.

It also has language that calls for teacher preparation program audits, expands professional development opportunities and creates new requirements for states to provide more detailed annual reports with the number of students receiving intervention, the number of teachers receiving professional development and the number of districts using high-quality learning materials aligned with the science of reading if they鈥檙e receiving the grant.

Keri Rodrigues, co-founder and president of the National Parents Union, said the bill’s passage out of committee is the result of years of advocacy from families.

鈥淭his is a bill that codifies the fact that the sky is blue,鈥� Rodrigues said. 鈥淲e鈥檙e just very excited that folks are seeing the importance of this, and we’re able to finally get [lawmakers] to show they can prioritize kids, they can be swayed based on evidence, they can actually make good decisions for kids and frankly do the right thing in what is a very difficult political climate.鈥�

Lawmakers on Thursday also considered the (S.3010), another piece of legislation that would affect students who are learning to read.

The 21st Century Dyslexia Act proposed to add and explicitly define dyslexia as a disability covered under the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 鈥� requiring schools to provide accommodations and other services needed for dyslexic students to be successful in the classroom.

Under IDEA, students with 鈥溾�� are protected, but Cassidy argued that making dyslexia a disability category 鈥� similar to what was done with 鈥� would 鈥渋ncrease screening, identification and the number of students receiving appropriate accommodations.”

鈥淲hen reading scores haven’t moved and 20% of readers are dyslexic 鈥� and therefore learn to read differently 鈥� we either choose or choose not to do something positive for these students,鈥� Cassidy said. 鈥淚f we’re serious about addressing the inexcusably low literacy rates, we must pass this bill.鈥�

More than a dozen organizations, including The Reading League, National Center for Learning Disabilities and International Dyslexia Association , with concerns it would undermine support and confuse states.

In a written statement, the organizations also argued the legislation could be harmful because it used an outdated definition of dyslexia from the early 2000s. A new definition, which removed old IQ-discrepancy requirements, was from the International Dyslexia Association.

Democratic lawmakers, such as Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut, brought up the challenges Thursday. 

鈥淭here are 27 states, including Indiana, Florida, Kansas, Ohio, South Carolina, that effectively ban the use of this definition. Congress banned the use of this definition in the 2004 version of the IDEA,鈥� Murphy said. 鈥淲hen you define dyslexia as relational between intelligence and reading ability, … many students with dyslexia 鈥� are judged to have lower intelligence levels. They don’t get services because you essentially have to show that there is a substantial difference between your reading ability and your assessed level of intelligence.鈥�

Murphy recommended to 鈥渃onvene a national conversation on this issue of the definition,鈥� and for the federal government 鈥渢o provide a higher level of technical assistance to states as they seek to get services out to people with disabilities,鈥� before the bill ultimately passed 12-10.

Did you use this article in your work?

We鈥檇 love to hear how 91涩漫鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.