91涩漫

Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for 91涩漫 Newsletter

A second-round education deregulation effort advanced to the governor鈥檚 desk Friday despite concerns from Democrats that the measure weakens educator protections and professional standards at a moment when Indiana schools are struggling with teacher recruitment and retention.

The House voted to concur with Senate changes to , capping a multi-year effort to strip unused, outdated and conflicting language from Indiana鈥檚 education code. The Senate approved the bill Wednesday in a vote.

Authored by Rep. Bob Behning, R-Indianapolis, the bill is part of the House GOP鈥檚 broader push to reduce regulatory requirements across state agencies and education systems. Behning has framed the effort as ongoing cleanup, .

Behning said Friday that concerns raised earlier by school administrators over contract language had been addressed in the final version of the bill.

鈥淭here was collaboration between the principals association [and] school boards,鈥� he said.

Behning also pointed to changes affecting school referendums and partnerships with outside providers.

鈥淭here was some language taken out dealing with first class mailing specifically on referendums,鈥� Behning said, adding that the bill allows schools to contract with private, for-profit or nonprofit providers for after-school care or preschool services.

But Rep. Vernon Smith, D-Gary, held that the deregulation package goes too far.

鈥淔or several years, educators have been coming to us 鈥� asking for deregulation, and I supported deregulation. However, this bill went way too far,鈥� Smith said.

He zeroed in on provisions eliminating contract language specifying teacher work hours.

鈥淲hen you take this provision out, what you鈥檙e doing is you鈥檙e allowing somebody who wants to be a dictator 鈥� to force people to stay as long as they want them to stay,鈥� Smith said.

鈥淲e鈥檙e having a problem already trying to attract people into the 鈥� career of being a teacher. Teachers all over the state have responded saying that they are concerned about this provision,鈥� he continued. 鈥淲e鈥檙e going to look back and we鈥檙e going to regret what we did to public education, because every session we destroy a valuable portion of it.鈥�

is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Indiana Capital Chronicle maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Niki Kelly for questions: [email protected].

Did you use this article in your work?

We鈥檇 love to hear how 91涩漫鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.